We're a week out from July 4th and I'm trying to figure out what to do with the day. There's a lot of events out there on that day so maybe we end up heading out into down town. According to Google...
You're welcome in this website.
So I had a relative pass away recently and needed some quick cash in mxn pesos. I went to a local exchange and received the price of the exchange. The exchange rate they gave me was 0.06280 USD or 1 USD = 15.92 MXN.
I last went to Wells Fargo around the time of this original post and got the same exchange rate MXNUSD instead of USDMXN. I finally signed up for an account and found that Wells Fargo will pay a better price than local exchanges and they will send you the money if you want it mailed.
At this time, Wells Fargo offers 0.06171 MXNUSD or 1 USD = 16.20 MXN.
It's a no brainer. Wells Fargo all the way.
Silver recently experienced a significant decline, touching an intraday low of $64.26, which represents a 14% drop for the month. This price action is the result of two separate but converging stories: a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve monetary policy and a major technological transition within the solar industry.
The first story involves a "mechanical" shift in monetary expectations. Nine Federal Reserve officials now project at least one rate hike before December 2026, a sharp move from zero officials in the previous dot plot. With the probability of a September hike sitting at 70%, bond yields have spiked, with the 2-year Treasury reaching 4.19%. Because silver does not pay interest, these higher yields increase the opportunity cost of holding the metal, driving capital into fixed-income assets and strengthening the US dollar.
Simultaneously, a structural shift occurred in industrial demand. Longi Green Energy, the world's largest solar manufacturer, announced it has begun replacing silver with copper in commercial production. This move was driven by silver’s rising cost, which jumped from 3% to 29% of a solar module's total expense in just three years. This substitution is expected to cause a 20% reduction in silver usage across the solar industry over the next 18 months, potentially removing 37 million ounces of annual demand.
Despite these bearish headlines, the source argues the structural supply deficit remains the dominant long-term force. While solar demand is contracting, other sectors—including electric vehicles (up 8%), AI infrastructure (up 12%), and defense (up 6%)—are increasing their silver consumption. Overall industrial demand is only expected to contract by 3% this year, remaining well above 550 million ounces.
Crucially, global supply cannot easily respond to these shifts. Approximately 70% of silver is mined as a byproduct of other metals, meaning production is tied to copper and zinc demand rather than silver prices. This has resulted in a projected 46 million ounce deficit for 2026, marking the sixth consecutive year of structural shortfall.
Moving forward, the $60 price level is the critical technical support; holding above this keeps the long-term bull market intact. With the gold-silver ratio at 62 suggesting undervaluation and physical investment demand projected to rise 20%, the current correction may represent a value opportunity as finite above-ground inventories continue to be depleted.
The current silver market presents a unique, historically significant opportunity that most investors are missing because they are waiting for mainstream validation rather than acting on clear data. This "ultimate revaluation" is driven by a convergence of forces that require "courageous seeing"—the willingness to look honestly at market fundamentals even when the consensus narrative suggests otherwise.
A key historical precedent for this opportunity is Warren Buffett’s 1999 purchase of 111 million ounces of physical silver. Buffett acted not on a currency crisis theory, but on a simple supply-and-demand deficit. The source argues that today’s fundamental data—including supply deficits, industrial demand, and stockpile depletion—is substantially stronger than the data Buffett acted upon decades ago.
This revaluation is powered by the simultaneous arrival of three independent forces:
A critical component of this thesis is the disconnect between paper and physical markets. Industry experts like Keith Neumeyer argue that paper futures markets have historically suppressed silver’s price. However, as physical supply tightens and delivery failures increase, physical reality will eventually overwhelm paper pricing, leading to a violent and rapid repricing.
Investors, or "stackers," are urged to transition from a simple accumulation phase to a "recognition phase" by securing their "architecture". This involves physical completeness (converting paper claims to actual metal), security (ensuring safe storage and estate planning), and knowledge (deepening conviction to withstand market volatility). Ultimately, acting before the window of opportunity closes provides personal freedom and security independent of stressed financial institutions. The source concludes that the revaluation is not just a prediction but an active process being produced by these measurable forces in real-time.
Space X IPO is finally here. I'm not exactly sure when the sale of the shares will begin but I expect it to be a monstrous upward trend.
Today XHB sits at $107
The drop in silver has been wild. Today the price has arrived to $64 USD. Can it go any lower? What about the banks predicting silver to be around 80 to 120 by end of year?
The video chronicles the permanent deletion and banning of the OG John AG channel on March 9th, a move that barred the owner from creating any future YouTube accounts. Before its removal, OG John AG was the dominant performer in the "AI Asian guy" niche, gaining approximately 8,000 subscribers and nearly 2 million views in a single month. This success occurred while similar competing channels saw stagnant or declining growth.
The ban stems from YouTube’s aggressive crackdown on "AI slop," defined as low-quality, mass-produced content. YouTube identifies such content using several "triggers," including repetitive thumbnails, recycled titles, formulaic script structures, and interchangeable visual formats. Although many AI channels are criticized for sensationalism, the source notes that OG John AG produced high-quality, researched market analysis on silver that held up under independent fact-checking.
Despite the quality of the analysis, YouTube cited "spam and deceptive practices" for the channel's removal. The video speculates this may have been triggered by suspicious engagement patterns, such as a "sus" consistency in view counts—regularly hitting 20,000 to 40,000 views per video—which could indicate artificial juicing. The narrator suggests this is a case of "the baby getting thrown out with the bathwater," where legitimate anonymous creators are penalized by aggressive, pattern-based enforcement.
The narrator concludes that the "wild west" era of these AI-generated personas is ending as YouTube assumes a more aggressive "sheriff" role. The creator is advised to either reveal their real face to establish authenticity or develop a fresh, original format that avoids the specific triggers used by the "YouTube Gestapo" to flag slop. Ultimately, the video calls for YouTube to retool its policies to better distinguish between low-effort farms and legitimate, though anonymous, experts
